Different Views on Assisted suicide (I Agree with Assisted Suicide) Essay

Different Views on Assisted suicide (I Agree with Assisted Suicide) - Essay Example In other words, medical profession is intended for saving life rather than destroying it. On the other hand, there are many people who believe that assisted suicide should be allowed legally in order to avoid the pain, agony and discomfort of the patients in no hope conditions. In their opinion, nobody wants to sustain their lives in miserable conditions, if the hope for a survival is completely out of question. Under such circumstances, it is better to assist those people in finishing their lives rather than forcing them to suffer the pain and agony further. In this paper I argue in favour of assisted suicide after analysing both the sides of the issue. Arguments against assisted suicide The major argument against assisted suicide is with respect to the ethical issues involved in it. â€Å"Many faith groups within Christian, Muslim, Jewish and other religions believe that God gives life and therefore only God should take it away† (Info: Ethical aspects of PAS, n. d.). Religio ns argue that life is the blessing of God and man has no authority over it. God has created human life on earth for certain missions. He takes the life back only after the completion of the mission assigned to each person. Disallowing God to complete his missions is unethical according to religions. Religions also argue that a life is waiting for every human after his death and in order to prepare for that life, God has given miseries to human in his present life. It is the duty of the human to go through all these mysteries in order to claim an eternal life after death. Religions believe that assisted suicide will prevent a person from attaining eternal life or salvation. Another argument raised by critics of assisted suicide is based on the importance of human life on earth. Even though, human succeeded in collecting information about outer universe or planets, still his knowledge about this universe is extremely limited. Science does not have any idea about whether life persists in other planets or not. In other words, earth is the only planet in which life exists as per the evidences we have until now. Thus, life becomes most precious thing in this universe. Since human has superior intellectual power, human life seems to be the most important one among other life forms and it should not be destroyed under any circumstances. The chemistry of life is still unknown to science even though we are living in a most advanced era at present. Human succeeded in unveiling many mysteries; however, the secret behind life is still uncatchable to them. Once the life is being destroyed, nobody can give it back to a person. In short, human life is the most important thing in this universe and it should not be destroyed, according to the arguments of critics of assisted suicide. The third argument against assisted suicide is related to philosophy. Many of the prominent philosophers like Immanuel Kant, John Locke etc were argued against the assisted suicide in one way or ot her. Locke argued that life, like liberty, represents an inalienable right, which cannot be taken from, or given away by, an individual. For Kant, suicide was a paradigmatic example of an action that violates moral responsibility. Kant believed that the proper end of rational beings requires self-preservation, and that suicide would therefore be inconsistent with the fundamental value of human life (Chapter 5: The Ethical Debate, 2001,